Fire Risk in Electric vs. Combustion Vehicles
Electric vehicles have a 20 times lower fire risk compared to traditional gas-powered cars. Discover key data and safety insights.
Introduction:
With the rise of electric mobility, vehicle safety, particularly regarding fire risk, has become an increasingly relevant concern. This article provides an overview of global data on the risk of fire in electric vehicles (EVs) compared to traditional internal combustion engine vehicles (ICEVs), debunking common misconceptions and offering a clear and data-driven perspective.
Methodology:
The analysis includes recent studies from countries such as the United States, Sweden, and Australia. Primary sources include government, academic, and industry reports, ensuring a global and accurate outlook.
Key Findings:
Fire Incidence in Electric Vehicles:
From 2010 to 2023, only 0.0012% of passenger electric vehicles were involved in battery-related fires, with just 393 incidents among over 30 million EVs worldwide. This data highlights the low likelihood of an EV catching fire, debunking the myth of their higher vulnerability compared to traditional vehicles [1].
Comparison with Internal Combustion Vehicles:
For ICEVs, the fire risk is about 20 times higher. In Sweden, for example, 68 fires occur per 100,000 internal combustion vehicles, while for electric vehicles, the rate drops dramatically to 3.8 per 100,000 vehicles [2].
Country-Specific Data:
- Australia: The Department of Defence estimated a fire probability for EVs of 0.0012% [2].
- United States: Kelley Blue Book confirms that EVs are less likely to catch fire than gasoline-powered vehicles [2].
General Fire Incidence Rate:
For internal combustion vehicles, the fire rate is estimated at around 0.08%, whereas for electric vehicles, it is significantly lower at just 0.0012% [1].
Discussion:
Contrary to popular belief, electric vehicles are less prone to fires than traditional vehicles. Advanced battery technology, such as lithium-ion with safety management systems, the absence of flammable liquid fuels, and sophisticated monitoring systems contribute to this outcome.
However, when fires do occur in EVs, they can be more complex to manage due to the nature of the batteries, requiring adequate preparedness from first responders.
Conclusion:
Global data clearly demonstrates that electric vehicles are less likely to catch fire than internal combustion vehicles, dispelling the myth of their alleged danger. This highlights how the EV industry has made significant strides in safety, making them a sustainable and safe choice for the future of mobility.
Recommendations:
- Conduct more in-depth research on LPG and natural gas vehicles to assess related risks.
- Continue improving safety protocols for all vehicle types.
- Educate first responders and the public on the actual risks and benefits of different propulsion technologies.
Sources:
This article, based on verified data, demonstrates that electric vehicles are significantly safer than internal combustion vehicles, particularly in terms of fire risk.
Written by: - Jan. 13, 2025, 10:54 a.m.
